Minimally Invasive Hip Replacement Pros And Cons

Direct superior approach.

Minimally invasive hip replacement pros and cons.

Other names for the procedure are minimally invasive or muscle sparing hip arthroplasty. There are pros and cons to traditional hip replacement when compared with minimally invasive hip replacement. The direct superior approach is a surgical technique to gain access to the hip joint. In traditional hip replacement a large incision 10 12 inches long is made to the side of the hip and the whole joint is exposed.

According to the centers for disease control and prevention cdc over 320 000 hip replacements were done. While new techniques instruments and prostheses have been developed specifically for minimally invasive surgeries there are many well established approaches to hip replacement. Certain conditions can damage the hip joint and result in needing to have the joint replaced the two most common conditions being rheumatoid. The goals of minimally invasive hip replacement surgery are to perform the operation with a smaller incision and less trauma to the deep tissues to reduce postoperative discomfort and to speed discharge from the hospital.

A hip replacement may be done for various reasons. In the meantime people considering hip replacement surgery and their surgeons must make decisions. Proponents of the two incision technique of hip replacement argue. However being a new surgery there are questions as to whether or not this is actually a better procedure.

The surrounding soft tissue is separated to allow access and visibility of the hip joint. This article is designed to give you a comprehensive review of what minimally invasive hip replacement surgery is all about. Potential advantages of anterior hip replacement. Less damage to major muscles the anterior approach avoids cutting major muscles.

1 6 this area of ongoing research is an example of how the medical field is continually evolving and trying to improve outcomes for patients. The direct superior approach has been developed as a minimally invasive technique to enter the hip joint without causing damage to some key muscle groups. Research on minimally invasive hip replacement surgery is mixed and it is not clear whether it has an advantage over traditional hip replacement surgery. The hope is that patients who undergo this minimally invasive hip replacement will have shorter hospital stays quicker rehabilitation and better results.

When performing a hip replacement your surgeon can get to the hip joint from the front from the side or from the back. Experts advise patients who are considering minimally invasive hip replacement to educate themselves on the pros and cons of the operation and choose their surgeons carefully.